|
Interview: Rodrigo Chavez, Bolivarian Circles National Coordinator*
1. What are the Bolivarian Circles in Venezuela?
What ideas do they promote and what do they do? Who formed the original
Circles?
Bolivarian Circles are the most basic instance of participation in the
democratic process in Venezuela, although not the only ones. There are
neighbor associations, cooperatives, indigenous groups among others. The
difference between Bolivarian Circles and others is the express commitment
to the defense of the revolution and the 1999 Bolivarian Constitution,
which was design by the people and approved with 86% of the popular vote.
This is something that a neighbor association may also believe in for
example, but it does not form part of their foundational statements. Also,
a Bolivarian Circle gets involved in country wide or international issues,
which is something that may not be of interest for a neighbor association.
2. What is the relationship between the Bolivarian
Circles and the Government of President Hugo Chavez?
President Chavez has made permanent calls for people to get organized
and to fight for their rights. Political parties were not the best way
to guarantee people's participation in the democratic process because
of their infighting and struggle for positions of leadership. With these
problems in mind, in 2000, he specifically called for the formation of
Bolivarian Circles and commended the then Vice-president of the Republic,
with providing all the necessary support to form the Bolivarian Circles
as independent cells of support for the revolution. The fact that Bolivarian
Circles were founded under a President call has made people think that
Bolivarian Circles are dependent on the government but in reality they
are autonomous and do not receive government funds. Bolivarian circles
are not corporations therefore they cannot access funds directly, but
they educate people and communities on how to access credits from different
lending institutions. They also allow people with common interests to
form coops, associations, non-profit corporations, etc. These organizations
have a corporate character and therefore can access funds from different
instances including community banks, international and government organizations,
etc.
3. The rich land owners and big bosses in Venezuela,
backed up by President Bush and the CIA tried to overthrow elected President
Hugo Chavez on April 11, 2002. How did the Bolivarian Circles respond
to the Coup de etat against President Hugo Chavez?
The Bolivarian Circles played a fundamental role in the re-establishment
of the Constitutional process in Venezuela, specially women. Women are
a major component of the organization and most of our leaders are women.
After the coup took place, there was a spontaneous movement that had no
government guidance or followed any previous government plan. It was the
Bolivarian Circles, with the Constitution in their hands, who through
their organization and high level of understanding of the need to defend
the democratic process the ones who started to take control of different
parts of the country, of key government and military installations and
together with the military supporting the constitution reverted the coup
and provided a unique historical situation where by the first time in
history a deposed president was able to come back to the presidency in
less than 48 hours.
4. As Coordinator for the Bolivarian Circles,
what did you do during those days?
I was not the Coordinator of the Bolivarian Circles at the time. But in
recognition to the historical process, it is important to mention that
it was during the coup d'etat that Bolivarian Circles were really born.
There was not and there will not be a coordinator telling the Circles
what to do, it was the people themselves who acted upon plans that they
themselves put together from their own communities who were able to bring
back the president and re-establish the Constitutional process.
5. How did the Bolivarian Circles respond during
the sabotage of the national oil industry by criminal company officials
and by corrupt oil union leaders?
Bolivarian Circles provided free labor, groups to defend oil installations,
connections to contact former oil workers. In addition, many oil workers
are themselves members of Bolivarian Circles, and created a network of
support and exchange that allowed for the recovery of the oil production
in record time.
6. Do the Bolivarian Circles work with unions?
As I mentioned before many members of the Bolivarian Circles are unionized
workers and union leaders. We as Bolivarian Circles provide integration
between union members and the rest of the community, in fact, making the
labor movement and the people's movement one. It does not mean that we
do not perceive the differences between the labor movement struggle and
the struggle of a community for a better education, but we have been able
to identify more commonalities than differences between different movements.
The integration of the struggles and demands of the labor movement with
those of the community are a fundamental factor in the current trend to
form a new kind of labor movement, and in fact most important labor unions
of the country have abandoned the CTV (Confederation of Venezuelan Workers)
to form new alternatives. The recently created Union of Workers UNT is
a response to the corruption of the CTV.
7. What motivates you to organize and fight
for the self-determination of the Venezuelan people? Why focus on the
Bolivarian Circles?
As a medical doctor, I was always concerned that in Venezuela, health
was perceived as the treatment of diseases. I believed in a more holistic
approach, I believed in education and prevention, but the more I got involved
in trying to address the situation the more convinced I got that it was
only people themselves who could solve their own problems and that health
problems were just another expression of our societal ills. From this
understanding to the Bolivarian Circles there is just a step.
8. What are the Bolivarian Movement's goals?
Is socialism on the agenda? Is creating a United States of Latin America
a goal?
The goal is the defense of the revolutionary process to form a society
with social justice, with economic justice, with a guarantee for real
political participation for all. This last point deserves special attention.
I am not talking here about voting every four or five years or whatever
the electoral cycle is. I am talking about people being able to directly
design their development projects, supervise and carry out their development
projects without intermediaries, without people representing them. Through
Bolivarian Circles, Neighborhood Associations, cooperatives, etc., people
can represent themselves before city councils and governorships. The citizen
assembly is a constitutional right. Articles 166 and 192 of the constitution
establish that governors and mayors must allow for communities to participate
in the design and implementation of their budgets. How do you call this?
Socialism? Communism? Populism? It is up to you. We just do not care about
the name as long as the process works. We call it Bolivarianism and participatory
democracy. Of course, Venezuelan problems are similar to those of other
countries in Latin America and the world. We should be receiving all the
support of the world as we try to solve problems in a way that has never
been tried before and as we confront powerful forces trying to maintain
the status quo. It has not materialized yet and if anything our efforts
have been received with skepticism. But we just keep going against all
odds trying to create an alternative model that provides an alternative
for Venezuela and other countries. We are sure that the ideas of a unified
Latin America are closer than ever because only people unite people. It
has been the interest of corporations and the wealthy which have separated
us in different countries and as a people. The unity of Latin America
is an essential component of Bolivar ideas so it is ours too.
9. Does the Bolivarian Movement relate to movements
in other countries? Which ones and why?
We relate to movements pursuing peace with social and economic justice,
fighting for the rights of the indigenous people, of the poor, of workers
in general. That is why we have a close relationship with indigenous movements
in Ecuador, Bolivia, Argentina, Canada and Guatemala. We are initiating
relationships with the Zapatistas in Mexico; we also have relationships
with the progressive movement all around the world in Africa, Asia, Europe,
and the American continent including the United States. We have special
relationships with the PT in Brazil and with the revolutionary process
in Cuba.
10. What are the important lessons you wish
to share with "Fight Back! News" readers?*
We knew we were confronting powerful interests and powerful forces, we
just did not know how powerful they were. Attempts to overthrow the government
and to put an end to our struggle continue. More than a hundred community
leaders have been killed mostly during the days of the coup. The key has
been organization and community participation in the decision making process.
We think that communities have their own leaders and that new leaders
are emerging all the time. Hugo Chavez is without a doubt a leader for
all communities but we do not depend on him, we accept his leadership
at a national level, as the person who has opened the political space
and allowed for us, the forgotten, the neglected, the oppressed to be
able to stand up for our rights. But in the end people are working for
their own projects and trying to build a future of their own.
11. What can people in the U.S. do to support
the struggle of the working people in Venezuela?
People in the United States should try to become more aware about the
realities, about what is really going on in Venezuela. They can form Bolivarian
Circles over there too; they can try to learn about our constitution and
try to implement similar reforms in your country. US people must also
oppose US government intervention in other countries' affairs, and please
denounce the mass media distorted portrait about Venezuela and other countries
that do not bend to US corporate attempts to take control of our resources
and dominate our politics.
* This interview was first published in the Fight Back Newspaper in May
2003
|
 |